Plastic surgeon turned longevity
“Treat the risk, and love more” · Toronto
Levels of Longevity Map Cory explores
Cory Goldberg is one of 100+ experts in the Live Beyond Project — a father & son quest for longevity.
Discover Live Beyond →Cory Goldberg is a plastic surgeon in Toronto — founder of FORM Face + Body, former head of plastic surgery at Trillium Health Partners, and a lecturer at the University of Toronto. The “basic-science background” is real: alongside his surgical residency he earned a master’s in biomedical engineering. And he is one of the clearest structural thinkers we met. He is fascinated by a pattern he sees in Canada: an unusually large biohacking and spiritual-longevity community — saunas, cold plunges, protocols — sitting alongside a research and clinical world that barely engages with any of it.
His explanation is regulatory. Canada’s single-payer public healthcare system is tightly controlled and slow to adopt anything new, and the research funding is prohibitive. So the technology reaches people not through clinicians or scientists but through individuals and companies — the population builds it from the ground up, because the institutions won’t.
From there he makes the argument that anchors his page. Regulatory frameworks are built for sick care: you wait until someone is ill, then offer a treatment they are effectively obliged to accept, because the alternative is staying sick. Longevity is the opposite — proactive, preventative, chosen. The person, not the disease, carries the responsibility. And existing frameworks, he says, simply do not recognise that difference.
His conclusion is contrarian and considered: longevity medicine should not try to grow inside public healthcare systems. They are too entrenched, too old, too slow. It should develop beside them, and integrate later. Trying to build it within, he says plainly, is not feasible.
And then, asked what he would tell a young person, he sets all of that aside. “The world is a school. We are all students and teachers at the same time.” His actual longevity advice is not a protocol: love more, hate less — which he calls, without irony, the biggest determinant of longevity there is.
We spent a few days in Canada with Cory — Toronto, and then out to the countryside, on the granite and lakes of the Canadian Shield, glacier-scraped rock and meltwater. The interview happened by the water, and it moves between the very practical (why the regulators are the bottleneck) and the almost spiritual (why loving more is the real longevity intervention).
“If somebody is sick and offered a treatment, they’re biased to accept it. With longevity, the alternative is just an ordinary life — so the responsibility sits with the person.”
— Cory Goldberg, Toronto
“The world is a school. We are all students and teachers at the same time.”
Cory Goldberg · On the Canadian Shield, July 2024In Canada, the technology reaches people through individuals and biohackers — not through clinicians or scientists.
Cory GoldbergRegulatory frameworks are built on sick care. Longevity is proactive. They aren’t ready for it.
Cory GoldbergTrying to develop longevity medicine inside a public healthcare system is not feasible.
Cory GoldbergIf we could each just learn to love more, it would make for a better world we’ll want to live longer in.
Cory GoldbergFrom the conversation on the lake — why the regulators are the bottleneck, where longevity medicine should live, and the advice he actually wanted to give.
In a tightly controlled single-payer system that is slow to adopt anything new, the advances don’t come from clinics or labs — they come from the population. Saunas, cold plunges, supplements, wearables: businesses and individuals build the longevity scene from the bottom up because the institutions won’t.
“It comes from the population, not the clinicians.”
Toronto · from the interviewHis sharpest point. A sick patient offered a treatment is effectively obliged to take it — the alternative is illness. A longevity intervention is chosen freely, and the responsibility shifts to the individual. Regulatory frameworks, built entirely around the first case, don’t know how to handle the second.
“They’re almost obligated. Longevity isn’t like that.”
Toronto · from the interviewHis prescription is contrarian: don’t try to build longevity medicine inside public healthcare. The systems are too entrenched and too slow to change. Let it develop alongside, prove itself, and integrate later — because forcing it in from the start simply will not work.
“The systems don’t know how to change.”
Toronto · from the interviewCory practices in Toronto at FORM Face + Body. Find him at corygoldbergmd.com and on Instagram at @drcorygoldbergmd.
The video interview is coming. Recorded interviews go live after the launch of the film & series Live Beyond.
From the conversation in Canada, July 2024, recorded by a lake on the Canadian Shield. Lightly edited for readability.
Cory Goldberg“In Canada there’s a very large focus on biohacking and on the spiritual side of longevity, and I think that’s because of the nature of our regulatory system. It’s prohibitive — it makes it difficult to advance basic science. Our clinical system is a public, single-payer system that’s tightly controlled and doesn’t adopt these advancements. So the access people have to these technologies is through individuals, through biohackers, through companies — cold plunges, saunas, things they can access. It comes from the population, not from the clinicians or the scientists.”
Cory Goldberg“The regulatory frameworks are old and too slow. They’re based on sick care — you wait for someone to become sick, then give them a treatment. Longevity is preventative, proactive. And there’s a bias: if somebody is sick and is offered a treatment, they’re biased to accept it, because the alternative is to be sick. With longevity, the alternative to a treatment is just to live an average, ordinary life. The frameworks don’t recognise this — so the individual has much more responsibility in what they choose.”
Cory Goldberg“The big question with public healthcare systems is whether longevity should develop within the system or beside it and then integrate. I personally believe they need to develop separately. Trying to develop longevity medicine within a public healthcare system is not feasible. The systems are very entrenched, they’ve existed for a long time in every country, and to change them is very difficult. In Canada, the healthcare system doesn’t know how to change.”
Cory Goldberg“Ageing is a chronic disease — it’s ongoing. Inflammaging is a real term: inflammation results in ageing. The most direct way it does this is through your genetics and epigenetics. Oxidative stress harms your genes directly, as well as the epigenetics of your composition. That oxidative stress can be reduced — so even from the point of view of what happens to your genes over time, this is something you can help.”
Cory Goldberg“You may have heard the expression the world is a stage. I believe the world is a school — and we are all students and teachers at the same time. Young people have a lot to teach us, their parents, the leaders of their countries and industries. They’re creating the change. And at the same time they’re students, with a lot to learn from people who have experience and wisdom. So remind young people that they’re teachers and students at once.”
Cory Goldberg“And the other thing, related to longevity: love more, hate less. It’s easy to hate someone who’s different from you. There are lots of things in our society that separate us and label us. If we could each just learn to love more, it would make for a better world we’ll want to live longer in — and it’s the biggest determinant of longevity there is.”
More passages from the full interview will be published here.
Cory Goldberg sits in Biohacking Upgrades (a surgeon’s take on interventions and beauty-span) and Creating the Movement — his regulatory argument is really about how the whole field grows.
Explore all 100+ experts